Calystegia pulchra

nl

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Calystegia pulchra

Quality:

Calystegia × pulchra - species of plant. Article “Calystegia pulchra” in Dutch Wikipedia has 2.9 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025).

This article has the best quality in German Wikipedia. However, the most popular language version of this article is English.

Since the creation of article “Calystegia pulchra”, its content was written by 19 registered users of Dutch Wikipedia and edited by 100 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 3 times in Dutch Wikipedia and cited 34 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (Dutch): #3328 in August 2005
  • Global: #60363 in August 2005

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (Dutch): #155058 in March 2009
  • Global: #964100 in December 2008

There are 8 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1German (de)
Schöne Zaunwinde
33.2818
2English (en)
Calystegia × pulchra
17.4097
3Vietnamese (vi)
Calystegia pulchra
16.9939
4French (fr)
Calystegia ×pulchra
14.9306
5Norwegian (no)
Rosenvindel
13.3021
6Azerbaijani (az)
Calystegia × pulchra
5.2429
7Swedish (sv)
Rosenvinda
4.5666
8Dutch (nl)
Calystegia pulchra
2.8879
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Calystegia pulchra" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Calystegia × pulchra
22 105
2German (de)
Schöne Zaunwinde
14 651
3Swedish (sv)
Rosenvinda
5 913
4Dutch (nl)
Calystegia pulchra
5 193
5French (fr)
Calystegia ×pulchra
1 547
6Norwegian (no)
Rosenvindel
1 006
7Vietnamese (vi)
Calystegia pulchra
570
8Azerbaijani (az)
Calystegia × pulchra
527
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Calystegia pulchra" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Calystegia × pulchra
130
2German (de)
Schöne Zaunwinde
99
3Swedish (sv)
Rosenvinda
62
4French (fr)
Calystegia ×pulchra
30
5Dutch (nl)
Calystegia pulchra
21
6Norwegian (no)
Rosenvindel
15
7Azerbaijani (az)
Calystegia × pulchra
11
8Vietnamese (vi)
Calystegia pulchra
4
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Calystegia pulchra" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1German (de)
Schöne Zaunwinde
29
2English (en)
Calystegia × pulchra
27
3Dutch (nl)
Calystegia pulchra
19
4Vietnamese (vi)
Calystegia pulchra
10
5Swedish (sv)
Rosenvinda
6
6Azerbaijani (az)
Calystegia × pulchra
5
7French (fr)
Calystegia ×pulchra
2
8Norwegian (no)
Rosenvindel
2
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Calystegia pulchra" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Azerbaijani (az)
Calystegia × pulchra
0
2German (de)
Schöne Zaunwinde
0
3English (en)
Calystegia × pulchra
0
4French (fr)
Calystegia ×pulchra
0
5Dutch (nl)
Calystegia pulchra
0
6Norwegian (no)
Rosenvindel
0
7Swedish (sv)
Rosenvinda
0
8Vietnamese (vi)
Calystegia pulchra
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Calystegia pulchra" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Calystegia × pulchra
9
2German (de)
Schöne Zaunwinde
7
3Azerbaijani (az)
Calystegia × pulchra
4
4French (fr)
Calystegia ×pulchra
4
5Swedish (sv)
Rosenvinda
4
6Dutch (nl)
Calystegia pulchra
3
7Norwegian (no)
Rosenvindel
3
8Vietnamese (vi)
Calystegia pulchra
0
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
Dutch:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
Dutch:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
Dutch:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
Dutch:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
Dutch:
Global:
Citations:
Dutch:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
azAzerbaijani
Calystegia × pulchra
deGerman
Schöne Zaunwinde
enEnglish
Calystegia × pulchra
frFrench
Calystegia ×pulchra
nlDutch
Calystegia pulchra
noNorwegian
Rosenvindel
svSwedish
Rosenvinda
viVietnamese
Calystegia pulchra

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank Dutch:
#155058
03.2009
Global:
#964100
12.2008

AI rank trends

Best Rank Dutch:
#3328
08.2005
Global:
#60363
08.2005

Local AI rank history

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 15 February 2026

On 15 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Wuthering Heights, 2026 Winter Olympics, Epstein files, Ilia Malinin, Wuthering Heights, Ghislaine Maxwell, Lucas Pinheiro Braathen, 2026 Winter Olympics medal table, Valentine's Day.

In Dutch Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Femke Kok, Jutta Leerdam, Bart Veldkamp, Anna Boersma, Pascale Naessens, Jens van 't Wout, Medaillespiegel van de Olympische Winterspelen 2026, Nij Beets, Estelle Cruijff, Ireen Wüst.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information